[My ex-husband] and I have the sweetest most compassionate friendshipi for life. And, I would wish for every divorcing couple, that they are able–through the process you are so good at leading gently–a life-long peace. –E.L.
There is often confusion between these processes, perhaps because those who participate in mediation are presumed to be “collaborative.” The basic difference? In mediation, there are three people in the room: the spouses negotiate for themselves with a neutral third person, the mediator, guiding the process. In Collaborative Practice, there are four people in the room: each spouse is represented by a Collaborative Lawyer who assists in the negotiation—without a mediator.
If you could know in advance that mediation would be a successful choice, you would choose it if for no other reason than it is likely to be less expensive than Collaborative Practice. The reason you might nevertheless choose Collaborative Practice is that, at the end of the day, the most economic process choice will be the one that is most appropriate for you and your spouse.